The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

Given that there would not appear to be any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a few of you offer a starting point with this mix and things to think about when Doing work this Load up?

Naturally, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of various great deal figures, but I think I understand why. It is a litigation-pushed environment, and several fool would surely deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and think of his personal custom combination of powder. What a earth.

Liberalism; The unachievable nevertheless accepted Idea that it is fully feasible to pick up a turd because of the thoroughly clean end.

That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, look for a beginning load when just one is mentioned for a selected cartridge.

Alaska The sc loads up somewhat improved but They may be the very same thing, a person is just limited cut. I’ve even mixed the conventional a person With all the SC and gotten the exact same benefits as using 1 or the opposite.

I'm sure, tough periods. H4831SC will definitely work, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded very long. I do not don't forget powder cost off the top of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps and that is wherever I usually purpose being. With your situation utilizing what you have (and what I ought to have accomplished) I'd start with the top on the bearing area on the bullet proper at the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you locate a velocity node.

I have utilised each and h4831 vs h4831sc applied the exact same costs and possess not been capable of convey to any noticable variances with overall performance. the SC Model meters a bit smoother is about all. any remarks??

and you h4831 vs h4831sc may want to put money into some new load data guides. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust over time. 4831 powder of years ago isn't really similar as what's available. that is certainly why anyone seriously interested in reloading safely can have by far the most present-day load data books to make reference to.

I have uncovered the precise reverse to become real in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally exact powder in my three hundred Get Mag.

[e mail protected] gn and 115 CT's, I've killed extra Deer with this particular combo than the many rifles I personal blended, Do the job as much as this even so the sweet location will probably be all around fifty four, I am a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat will work rather well for me In case your interested

Kansas Town, MO I'd seize regardless of what is obtainable right now. I’ve applied the two though with my check out load and didn’t see anything at all distinctive functionality wise.

The "SC" stands for Short Slash. I have not observed a distinction between both powder dut I don't Assume I'd mix them.

Several of the old Lyman data just stated IMR 4831, which was surplus armed forces powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.

The truth that the H4831 is in truth h4831sc a slower burning powder is precisely why you happen to be looking at larger velocities received with that powder, as opposed to Whatever you've seen Using the IMR things.